Fidonet Portal

From: Andrew Leary (1:320/219)
To: All
Date: Sun, 14.02.21 04:28
Future of web site
Hello Alexey!

14 Feb 21 07:27, you wrote to andrew clarke:

AV> These are primarily the git repositories. I'd be happy to use git for
AV> all our needs several years ago (when I was a member of the FTSC), but
AV> some old farts appeared unable to learn ever more simple things than
AV> git and gpg.

I'm certainly open to maintaining the document library via a git repository.

ac>> So to save on hosting costs

AV> I wouldn't go bankrupt whether I'd spend 0.01 RUB on it again. I have
AV> a number of servers with a plenty of resources, so those 17 Mb for the
AV> ${subj} are very hard to notice in a total load.

ac>> (and the risk of expiring etc)

AV> This is the only real risk.

I've got this under control; the US $16.88 per year is unlikely to bankrupt me

ac>> I suggest decomissioning the current FTSC web site and hosting
ac>> all the FTSC documents on GitHub, and uploading a snapshot to

AV> GitHub is distrusted (they are known to wipe whole projects due to
AV> politically "unreliable" people rarticipating there), so it could
AV> serve only as a mirror. Anyway, to do that we have to start using git,
AV> so here's a question: out of all candidates, who is familiar with it?

I'm not officially a candidate yet, but I am familiar with git; I use it for
mbsebbs, among other things.

ac>> Then if anyone still wants to go to the trouble of keeping the
ac>> domain & web site alive they can redirect web visitors
ac>> to the GitHub repo instead.

AV> Fidonet is didstributed, so should be the storage. Git seems to be a
AV> good solution, but we should avoid using any and all centralized
AV> services.

I don't see an issue with using something such as GitHub or GitLab; however it
should not be the only archive for FTSC documents.

AV> Once we had the domain. In order to keep people away from
AV> using it as the only source of actual connection information, we had
AV> to let it expire (some people, including me, knew all the necessary
AV> bank reqs, but nobody had paid for it) and being squatted.

AV> Current ${subj} is a bit unfriendly to a search engines, but it's very
AV> friendly to mirroring software like wget. That's not what we could
AV> have with git, but it allows anyone to keep their own FTSC documents
AV> archive.


ac>> The Wikipedia entry for FidoNet could also point to both the
ac>> GitHub repo and snapshot, since they're fairly
ac>> relevant.

AV> Seems unwise. Keeping and adding some mirrors would be mush
AV> better.

I agree that the site should be maintained.

ac>> Hosting all the FTSC documents on GitHub would be particularly
ac>> useful since it would allow anyone to write bug reports or file
ac>> "issues" relating to the various FidoNet standards documents,
ac>> which may help any future developers. (Or historians...Wink

AV> "FidoNet is our primary mode of communication" // (q)

AV> So all reports should go here, to the FTSC_PUBLIC echoarea. Also, git
AV> can work over a netmail...



--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: Phoenix BBS * (1:320/219)


This forum contains echomail areas hosted on Nightmare BBS You can browse local echomail areas, italian fidonet areas and a selection of international fidonet areas, reading messages posted by users in Nightmare BBS or even other BBSs all over the world. You can find file areas too (functional to fidonet technology). You can browse echomail areas and download files with no registration, but if you want to write messages in echomail areas, or use fidonet netmail (private messages with fidomet technology), you have to register. Only a minimal set of data is required, functional to echomail and netmail usage (name, password, email); a registration and login with facebook is provided too, to allow easy registration. If you won't follow rules (each echomail areas has its own, regularly posted in the echomail), your account may be suspended;