Fidonet Portal

From: Ardith Hinton (1:153/716)
To: All
Date: Fri, 30.11.12 04:12
Quotation Marks.... 1.
Hi, Paul! Recently you wrote in a message to Ardith Hinton:

AH> And once you'd commented on [Alexander's kludge lines],
AH> I couldn't help running to the dictionary to clarify my
AH> understanding of the word "heuristic"... [grin].

PQ> So would I but I don't have a desperate need

Thank goodness... at last I've met somebody who actually knows how to
spell "desperate". For this relief, much thanks... [Wm. Shakespeare].

PQ> to know the meaning with any precision at this time
PQ> of the night,

Ah. Thanks for the heads up. That's something others miss when they
insist on using UTC time. If I see a person writing in the middle of the night
when they usually arise at dawn & go to bed at sunset, I realize they may be in
deep distress. I'll take a second look and possibly get back to them ASAP even
though I have unanswered messages which arrived earlier. Doing the math I must
do to calculate "clock time" in Russia or Australia at the time of writing is a
different skill which involves a different part of the brain. At 22:39 you are
ready to hit the sack, while I'm just hitting my stride & wondering if I'll get
whatever I've been working on finished by midnight. Glad to know that.... Smile

PQ> as I have a fair understanding of why the word is used. ;-)

I know how it is used in the EdBiz, but wasn't sure how it applied in
this context. Fortunately Dallas is well acquainted with both. Smile

[re Alexander's story about the boy & the cigar]
PQ> I see it as a narrative of an incident between two
PQ> people. I'm trying to keep it simple by looking at
PQ> it as a 'he said', 'we said', 'they said' sort of
PQ> thing, where the story (joke) unfolds as the result
PQ> of the to & fro conversation. So, I would use double
PQ> quotes for the statements made in the narrative as
PQ> they are the actual words spoken.

Yes, the joke is essentially narrative except for the last two lines.
That's why I'd be inclined to keep the quotation marks as well. Smile

PQ> The simple guide I use is that any words actually
PQ> spoken are in double quotes. Anything else lending
PQ> to understanding statements made or other actions,
PQ> may be optionally single or double quoted.

In the interests of clarity I prefer to use double quotation marks as
my default because they're unlikely to be confused with apostrophes, but I have
some concerns WRT your use of the word "optional" in the second sentence above.
As you can see I use double quotation marks to set off isolated words & phrases
regardless of whether somebody else used them first. There are conventions WRT
quotes within quotes... again, in the interests of clarity. For example:

"Should I say 'was' or 'were'?" Alexander enquired. [esp. US]
'Should I say "was" or "were"?' Alexander enquired. [esp. UK]

Either way is correct, and whichever others prefer is fine with me. I can't be
sure from the above description, however, whether you've grasped the principle.
I bend rules myself from time to time... but only within certain limits. Maybe
the issue of quotes within quotes hadn't occurred to you because you don't read
the sort of material where it is likely to arise. If you use an unconventional
style of punctuation because your advisors hadn't considered the matter either,
it's no wonder you feel you're up the creek without a paddle sometimes.... ;-)

Anne Stilman, in her book GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, says:

The occasional style guide may instruct you to use
double marks for some purposes and single marks for
others, but most keep things simpler.

That's another possibility I hadn't considered until I re-read the same pages I
turned to awhile ago when Alexander & I discussed this topic. Style manuals...
the bane of my existence, as a university student, because it seemed that every
instructor in the English department wanted us to use a different one! You may
have understood perfectly the advice you got from a reputable source & followed
it to the letter. But if this source does things very differently from the way
others do them, their methods may confuse rather than assist your readers. :-Q

--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+
* Origin: Wits' End, Vancouver CANADA (1:153/716)


This forum contains echomail areas hosted on Nightmare BBS You can browse local echomail areas, italian fidonet areas and a selection of international fidonet areas, reading messages posted by users in Nightmare BBS or even other BBSs all over the world. You can find file areas too (functional to fidonet technology). You can browse echomail areas and download files with no registration, but if you want to write messages in echomail areas, or use fidonet netmail (private messages with fidomet technology), you have to register. Only a minimal set of data is required, functional to echomail and netmail usage (name, password, email); a registration and login with facebook is provided too, to allow easy registration. If you won't follow rules (each echomail areas has its own, regularly posted in the echomail), your account may be suspended;