Date: Mon, 30.07.18 23:09
Re: [NEWS] Star Wars: Episode IX Cast Announced
On 2018-07-29 23:03:29 +0000, Wolffan said:
> On 29 Jul 2018, Your Name wrote
> (in article ):
>> On 2018-07-29 15:04:13 +0000, Wolffan said:
>>> On 27 Jul 2018, Your Name wrote
>>> (in article ):
>>> [snip it all]
>>> The Phantom Menace was the first Star Wars movie that I didn' t see at
>>> twice in theatres. It was not the last.
>>> The Last Jedi was the first Star Wars movie that I didn t see at
>>> least once
>>> in theatres. It was not the last.
>> I saw all the Prequel Trilogy in the cinema, but gave up after seeing
>> the first 3D-erised re-release ... which I walked out of early as well.
>> I can't remember if I watched the animated Clone Wars movie in the
>> cinema or not. I haven't bothered watching any of JarJar Abrams'
>> garbage in the cinema.
>>> Solo was the first Star Wars movie that I didn t buy a DVD/BluRay
>>> (or, for
>>> the older ones, a VHS tape) of, if only because DVDs aren' t out yet.
>>> probably won 't be buying DVDs of Solo. It probably will not be the last.
>> Rogue One was much better than the rehashed garbage JarJar Abrams'
>> keeps dishing out, so Solo is likely to also be better than the
>> Episodes as well ... i's impossible for it to be worse!
> Rogue One was the best Star Wars movie since Empire Strikes back, making it
> the second best ever, kicking New Hope down to third and Return of the. Jedi
> to fourth.
There were rumours of a second Rogue One movie, but I can't see how
they could make one (they killed everyone at the end! ... unless it's
a prequel about Jyn Erso, but then it's not really "Rogue One".
They could basically re-make it using a different set of characters
going "rogue", but that would be just as stupid as JarJar Abrams' lazy
>> One of the problems with Solo is that the trailers make it look like
>> Lando has been turned into an effeminate idiot, and this newly-created
>> sexuality idiotically used as promotional material to appease the
>> "Equality" / "Politically Correct" nutters.
>> Another problem might be having a different actor play Han. Characters
>> obviously take on aspects of the actor playing the role, so bringing in
>> someone else to play the role rarely works very well.
>>> It is possible that the depth of my interest in the cast list of the next
>>> Star Wars movie may be discernible.
>> With Lando's return and rumours of yet another Death Star, it looks
>> more and more like "Episode 9" will just be yet another rehash rip-off
>> of George Lucas' movies, which would simply further prove that JarJar
>> Abrams is a talentless, lazy moron who has no clue how to make Star
>> Wars movies (nor anything else for that matter since he also ruined
>> Star Trek and everything else he sticks his nose into!.
> Will the Emperor... ah, the Leader... rise from the dead? Will Han Solo
Harrison Ford isn't listed in teh cast, so it's unlikely, thankfully,
that Han Solo returns ... although there is another ridiculously stupid
(and un-Star Wars like) rumour floating around that Episode 9 involves
time travel to go back and rescue Han. Mind you, I wouldn't be at all
surprised by whatever idiocy JarJar Abrams shovels into this mess he's
made of the Franchise. :-\
> Will there be Ewoks? For the answers to these and other burning
> questions, tune in, same Jedi-time, same Jedi-channel.
> I'll pass.
We've already had the Ewoks ... they were called Porgs. ;-)
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2
* Origin: News Gate @ Net396 -Huntsville, AL - USA (1:396/4)