Fidonet Portal

From: Ross Cassell (1:123/456)
To: All
Date: Fri, 02.12.11 12:17

02 Dec 11 13:52, you wrote to me:

BF>>> Of course. I challenged it before he cast his vote (in a comment
BF>>> to Roy).

RC>> So I ask again, would you have done the "same thing" if Dallas
RC>> had voted for both you and Michiel?

BF> I've already answered that question (se above). The answer is still
BF> the same.

I find that hard to believe...

If Dallas had voted for you, I doubt you would have challenged it.

RC>> I note today that RC30 voted no for you and yes to all the rest,
RC>> to what do you attribute his no vote that might be different from
RC>> the other no votes you received?

BF> I have no idea why, but a good guess is that they -- like so many
BF> others -- think that this is a popularity contest.

What else is there???

Why have a ballot choice with a binary answer, if one is supposed to reject one
of the 2 possible answers?

Why was your ballot or Mr Mohn's ballots so righteous?

Sometimes its the personal interaction one observes that one uses as

Maybe a person running for Parliament has 4568 PHD's and bookoo years of
experience, but yet has social positions and a matching agenda that are
opposite your own, somehow I doubt you would vote for that MP wannabe..

BF> People who wants the FTSC to remain a toothless tiger should make
BF> sure that nobody with outspoken opinions, who is not afraid to call
BF> things with it's proper name of fear to become unpopular, should vote
BF> no to any such candidate.

Outspoken opinions on the FTSC for what purpose??

Do you plan on voicing your non-Fidonet related opinions on the FTSC?

Will you crusade to have canned laughter banned from US TV programming when
elected to the FTSC?

I hope you plan on leaving the non-fidonet related baggage in the top left hand
drawer of your desk!

RC>> Also since you brought up voting and election protocol in your
RC>> failed challenge, would you not find it odd that Michiel Van Der
RC>> Vlist is himself counting the votes with himself being on the
RC>> list of candidates? Would not the proper thing to do is to have
RC>> someone coordinate this election who has no standing to vote or
RC>> be voted up or down?

BF> Michiel's integrity is in my opinion way above any doubt, so I have
BF> absolutely no problem with that.

On that we agree, however to avoid the appearance of impropriety, one usually
removes oneself from such a perception or risk of same.

BF> If you, on the other hand, have problems with it, how come you
BF> didn't object two years ago, when *you* were a candidate? The
BF> situation then was exactly the same as now.

I didnt know I was counting the votes two years ago... oops!

Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader:
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Other Places:

Have A Happy Holiday Season!

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20060121
* Origin: The Eastern Star - Spartanburg, SC USA (1:123/456)


This forum contains echomail areas hosted on Nightmare BBS You can browse local echomail areas, italian fidonet areas and a selection of international fidonet areas, reading messages posted by users in Nightmare BBS or even other BBSs all over the world. You can find file areas too (functional to fidonet technology). You can browse echomail areas and download files with no registration, but if you want to write messages in echomail areas, or use fidonet netmail (private messages with fidomet technology), you have to register. Only a minimal set of data is required, functional to echomail and netmail usage (name, password, email); a registration and login with facebook is provided too, to allow easy registration. If you won't follow rules (each echomail areas has its own, regularly posted in the echomail), your account may be suspended;